But why did it take them a half-decade to process the data and generate a final image? The answer is that this type of astronomy is hard - very hard. And this time, the picture captured Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the supermassive black hole that lurks at the heart of our own Milky Way galaxy.ĭespite being released in 2022, the EHT collaboration collected the data for this historic shot back in 2017. It wasn't until after that that Katie Bouman's team produced the real picture and verified the Interstellar renderings.Last week, the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration delivered its second stunning and haunting image of the accretion disk around a black hole. The renders that were produced looked incredible and some scientific papers were written as a result. What's interesting about the Interstellar renderings is that movie studio have access to massive render farms so Christopher Nolan set them the task of crunching the numbers hard. So it's conceivable that he got to see some of the footage. Interstellar was released later in the year that Stephen died. Kip and Stephen had a blackhole relationship. Kip Thorn was the science advisor on that movie. That said, he might have been able to see a sneak peak at the renderings from Christopher Nolan's Interstellar movie. Before that it was all 1's and 0's in a bunch of hard drives. This is the image of the team lead whose computer spat out the image. There is a documentary on the process somewhere. The set of images is called a “prior”, and the teams had to make sure that the choice of images used for this process didn’t create a bias in the inverted image we see. The most interesting part of all this is that the image we see is actually composed of smaller tiled images of things that look like what a black hole would look like. This is why they had independent teams each generate their own image - to ensure the images all looked similar and not too diverse. The challenge is that there are multiple images of black holes that could have matched the observed data. Instead, researchers had to generate a picture of the black hole that matched the observed data the telescopes collected, which was only a partial “image”(not really an image but what it actually was is beyond the scope of this simplification). The telescopes didn’t actually take a full picture of the black hole. We have a discord server at, feel free to join. Moderation will be strictly enforced on those not following the rules Discord Please report comments & links that don't follow the rules Memes/jokes/circle-jerk/trolling/insults.Backup scientific claims with appropriate links.On topic comments that convey meaningful information.Posts that only state your opinion and don't engage the community.Highly recommended subreddit: r/askscience.Open-ended questions that promote discussion.Straightforward questions (who/what/where) belong to the Weekly Space Questions thread (pinned at the top) Recommended subreddits: r/spaceporn, r/astrophotography & r/astronomy for images and r/spacegifs for GIFs. If you are the photographer do not include additional demographic information, the image should stand on its own merit Include information about the subject, equipment, processing, and name of the photographer Short videos without meaningful audio content qualify as GIFs.ĭirectly linked quality images/GIFs with an appropriate and concise title SpaceX launch coverage by SpaceXĭuplicate/re-hosted content (use Reddit Search) Social media links (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.)Įxception: Twitter links are allowed only for breaking news by official sources. Blogspam, links behind a paywall, or pirated content.Sensationalized/misleading titles or Unscientific content.Academic texts that are publicly available.Peer-reviewed research papers that are publicly available.Informative high-quality articles, news & videos.Please limit yourself to no more than 5 submissions per 24 hours. Please use original sources for content wherever possible. To suggest events, message the moderators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |